Marxist approach to International Relations

The Marxist approach to the study of international relational is unconventional, as it insists on the need for change, unlike the realist and liberals. It is not status-quoits and stands for radical change of the existing international/world order. Liberals and Realist theories hold that power is organized vertically, reflecting the division of the world into independent states, Marxism advances a theory of horizontal organization based on international class. Marxist agrees that the social world must be viewed and analyzed in totality. They insist that understanding one without knowledge of the other is not possible because the social world can only be studied as a whole. Another key element of the Marxist approach is the materialist conception of history. Economic development serves as the motor of history. The central dynamic that Marx identifies is tension between means of production and relations of production that together form the economic base of a given society. The legal,...

Constructivist approach

 After the Cold War, international relations discourse provided more diverse approaches to understand and analyze world politics. Constructivism theory is one of the models of the progressing emergence of international relations theory.

According to constructivist approach, the behavior of humans is determined by their identity, which itself is shaped by society’s values, history, practices, and institutions. Constructivists hold that all institutions, including the state, are socially constructed, in the sense that they reflect an “intersubjective consensus” of shared beliefs about political practice, acceptable social behavior, and values. In much the same way, the individual members of the state or other unit continuously construct the reality about which policy decisions, including decisions about war and peace and conflict and cooperation, are made.

While realism and liberalism concentrate on material factors like power or corporation, constructivist theory tends to focus on the influence of ideas. Their focus is on the predominant discourse in society. 

The post-Cold War era played a significant role in legitimating constructivist approach because both liberalism and realism were unsuccessful in predicting this event and had difficulties explaining it. On the contrary, constructivists had an explanation based on ideas and norms; for example, the idea of “common security,” adopted by Gorbachev.

Constructivism theory discusses the issue of anarchy in the international system, they focuses more on the role of norms, claiming that international law and other normative principles have decreased mainly the notions of sovereignty and changed the legitimate purposes for which state power may be used.

Constructivism is not a theory, but rather an ontology. It is a group of assumptions and hypotheses about three main spheres: humans, the world, and agency. It succeeds in challenging and defying the rationalists’ theories and approaches like realism and liberalism, moreover, Constructivism theory provides constructivist alternatives which can explain and understand world politics through the material and nonmaterial factors. It also adopts different levels of analysis including the international, regional, and internal level.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Configure John Rawls Theory of Justice (IGNOU/UPSC/STATE EXAMS)

Economic consequences of migration (IGNOU/UPSC/STATE EXAMS)

Issues of Human Rights (IGNOU/UPSC/STATE EXAMS)